Wednesday, May 2, 2012

The Yellow Gauguin


I would have to say that Gauguin's painting, “The Yellow Christ” can be considered as “avant-garde” for a few reasons, that include “reference, deference, and difference.” To start though, it reminds me of a slide from this weeks lecture that had “Avant-Garde” described as : 1. Challenging authority, and 2. Displayed art with unconventional techniques and modern subjects.

When I look at “The Yellow Christ” I can see that Gauguin is doing both of these. He challenges authority by possibly having Christ be a portrait of himself, while also depicting Christ in a sickly yellow color, within a modern setting. That's not what I would call conventional for a painting of the crucifixion.The painting is also unconventional because it's full of bright, but dirty colors, and it isn't a 'study of light' like in impressionism. Instead the colors give a sad and almost sickening feeling to the painting. And again it's also unconventional because it's depicting Christ in a modern setting, for the modern theme of the struggling artist verses the public.

Here are my broken up ideas for Gauguins, “reference, defere,ce and difference.”

Reference: I see this in how Gauguin chose to depict Christ in this painting. The way Christ is posed is a very iconic and recognizable image that's related to probably a thousand other paintings around the world. It shows that Gauguin is aware, of both current and past depictions of Christ and of the crucifixion. I also see reference in the colors that he chose to use, in order to depict emotion.

Deference and Difference: I would say that both of these connect to a term to describe art from this time period, “Synthetism.” Which is, “based on the idea that art should be a synthesis of three features, the outward appearance of natural forms, the artist's feelings about his subject, and purely aesthetic considerations of line, color, and form. Within, “The Yellow Christ” I can see that Gauguin has made it so that the viewer can recognize all of the natural (and unnatural) forms in the painting. His lines for them are also exaggerated and thick in some areas, while in other areas of the painting they are under exaggerated, and barely there, if not there at all. It makes the painting distorted and focuses attention on the aesthetic, as well as focuses on Gauguin's meaning behind the painting and the feelings that it should evoke.

2 comments:

Alberti's Window said...

You've got some good ideas. I think that you could even separate "deference" and "difference" a bit more. Gauguin seems to be deferring to some of the most recent and radical trends in art, including Impressionism. Gauguin has looser brushstrokes and an interest in color, similar to what the Impressionists have done. However, as a Synthetist, he sets himself apart from the Impressionists by using unnatural colors and exaggerating his use of line.

-Prof. Bowen

Kelsee Franz said...

I really like how you said that the colors he used were dirty and sickening. It made me see yellow in an entirely different light, since i usually really like yellow. I also like how you separated the three terms (mostly) and explained about them within the painting. It made it alot more clear what it all means relative to specific paintings, other than being explained en masse.